She Went Looking For Why Her Shape Changed at 51. The Answer Was In A Field At 14,000 Feet.

A Chicago woman spent two years asking why her body had rearranged itself on the same weight. The thread she pulled ended in the Peruvian highlands — and in a 2005 trial almost nobody in her doctor's office had read.
By Marguerite OseiNutrition & field reporting · The Midlife Review · today
In short:Beverly's weight has moved four pounds in eleven years. Her measurements have moved four inches. Those turn out to be two different problems, and only one of them has a name most doctors use.
Terraced maca fields in the Junin highlands of Peru
Maca has been farmed on terraces like these, above 13,000 feet in the Junín plateau, for longer than anyone has been writing things down.
Skip to what she ended up takingThe five botanicals, and what each one is actually for

It was a zipper on a dress she had owned for nine years.

Not a scale. The scale had been telling Beverly roughly the same story since her youngest started high school — one hundred sixty-one, give or take four pounds, every Sunday morning, same bathroom tile. The number was not the problem. The number had never been the problem.

"It was my niece's graduation," she says. "Navy dress. I'd worn it to two funerals and a wedding. And I got it up to about here" — she holds a hand flat against her ribs — "and it stopped. Same dress. Same weight. I stood in my bedroom and I genuinely could not work out what had happened to me."

Beverly is 51, works in medical billing on the South Side of Chicago, and has kept the same Sunday weigh-in ritual for over a decade. What follows is her account of the two years she spent trying to get a straight answer, and what she found at the end of it — which was not what she went looking for.

"Same dress. Same weight. Something had moved."

"Everything came back normal"

She did go and ask. That was the October after the graduation.

"I sat there and I said, my body has changed shape and I have not changed anything. And she was kind about it. She ordered the panel."

The bloodwork came back the following week. Every line inside the reference range. Thyroid fine. Fasting glucose fine. And then the sentence Beverly says she has since heard from four different women at her church, almost word for word: that's just what happens.

She is careful to be fair about this. "She wasn't being lazy with me. She wasn't wrong, either." A blood panel measures how much of something is circulating on the particular morning you happen to sit down in the chair. There is no line on that sheet for the question Beverly was actually asking — which was not how much, but where.

What the panel does not askTwo women can have identical bloodwork, identical weight, and different silhouettes. Circulating levels and tissue distribution are separate questions. Standard panels answer the first one.
"Normal" was the part she couldn't get past. Nothing was wrong. Something had still changed.

Nothing left. It relocated.

The part nobody had explained to her is not controversial and is not new. It is simply not what gets said in a twelve-minute appointment.

Oestrogen does more than reproduction. Among other jobs, it is one of the signals that tells the body where to keep fat — which is why, for about thirty years, women bank it at the hips and thighs and glutes. When that signal fades through the forties and fifties, the body does not necessarily store more. It stores it somewhere else. The abdomen.

A longitudinal study out of Pennington published in 2008 followed women straight through the menopausal transition and measured it: visceral fat up, energy expenditure down, and the change tracked the transition itself rather than the birthdays.

Her curves didn't leave. They changed address.

This reframes almost everything Beverly had already tried. "I did eighteen months of squats. Three days a week. I have never had stronger legs in my life and it did absolutely nothing to the shape of me."

It wouldn't. A diet lowers the total. Training builds what is underneath. Neither one issues the instruction about where — and if the instruction is what changed, neither one is aimed at the problem.

Say this plainlyNothing you can swallow moves fat from one part of a body to another. Any page that tells you otherwise is lying to you, and this one is not going to. What follows is about the upstream signalling, which is a smaller and more honest claim.

The root that kept coming up

Beverly says she spent most of the following winter reading. "I'm in medical billing. I read documents for a living. So I went and read."

The same plant kept surfacing, and it was not one she had heard of in any pharmacy aisle.

Maca — Lepidium meyenii — grows on the Junín plateau in the central Peruvian Andes, between roughly 13,000 and 14,500 feet. It is a brutal place to farm anything: freezing nights, thin air, punishing ultraviolet, poor soil. Very little food crop tolerates it. Maca does.

The Quechua-speaking communities of that plateau — the descendants of the people who ran the Inca state out of Cusco — have cultivated it there for an extremely long time. Peruvian researchers date domestication to somewhere around 1600 BC. It has been traded, taxed, dried on the ground in the sun for weeks the way it still is, and eaten daily, for most of recorded Andean history.

Hands pulling a maca root from high-altitude soil
Maca is still lifted by hand and sun-cured on the ground for weeks before it is used — a step the traditional preparation treats as non-negotiable.

What it is — and what it is not

Here is where Beverly says most of what she read online turned out to be wrong, and where this article is going to disagree with a lot of its competitors.

Maca is not a phytoestrogen. It is an adaptogen. This matters, and it is testable, and it has been tested: in the trials that actually measured the hormones, women's oestradiol, FSH and LH did not move. Whatever maca is doing, it is not doing it by acting like a hormone or by putting one into you.

What did move, in a 2005 double-blind trial in early-postmenopausal women, were the symptom scores — and they moved against placebo. The compounds it carries that are not found in other plants are called macamides and macaenes.

Why the honest version is the better oneA plant that is not a hormone cannot be sold as a replacement for one. It also cannot carry a hormone's risks. Both halves of that are true and you should want the page that tells you both.

"That was the thing that made me trust it, weirdly," Beverly says. "Everything else I'd looked at was promising me my twenties back. This was a plant that did one modest thing and had the paperwork for it."

The second root: the one for the stress

Maca on its own did not account for everything she was dealing with, and she is blunt about the rest of it.

"I was doing twelve-hour shifts and caring for my mother. My cortisol was not a mystery."

Cortisol is the other half of this story and it is the half with the cleanest evidence. Chronically elevated cortisol pushes storage toward the abdomen specifically — it works in the same direction as the oestrogen shift, which is why the two together are so much worse than either alone. A 2012 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ashwagandha root extract measured serum cortisol down substantially against placebo over sixty days.

Ashwagandha is Indian, not Andean — used in Ayurvedic practice for about three thousand years, on a different continent, for reasons that had nothing to do with any of this. It ended up in the same bottle for a boring modern reason: it is the best-evidenced thing available for the cortisol side.

Maca root, ashwagandha root and tongkat ali bark laid out with field notes
Three continents on one table: maca from Peru, ashwagandha from India, tongkat ali from the Malay peninsula. None of them were traditionally used for the reason they are combined now.

The one that actually is a phytoestrogen

If you have been told that this category works by "plant oestrogens", the plant they meant is almost certainly not maca. It is fenugreek.

Fenugreek is the genuine phytoestrogen here, and it is the one with the real cautions attached: it can lower blood sugar, which is a live consideration if you take metformin or anything else for diabetes, and it cross-reacts with peanut and legume allergies. Beverly checked with her mother's pharmacist before she started, which is what anyone should do.

Alongside those three sit beet root and a small amount of L-arginine — nitrate to nitric oxide, an established and unglamorous pathway — plus tongkat ali, ginseng, turmeric, nettle and slippery elm at supporting weights.

Not a hormone. Not hormone replacement.None of this is HRT and none of it is a substitute for it. If what you need is hormone therapy, the conversation is with your doctor, not with a bottle. No plant replaces what a body has stopped producing.

Under the tongue, not down the throat

The last thing Beverly changed was the format, and she says it is the part she would have dismissed a year earlier.

She had already bought maca capsules once. Twelve dollars. "Did nothing. I assumed the plant was rubbish."

A capsule has to survive stomach acid and then a first pass through the liver before anything reaches circulation. A liquid held under the tongue for thirty seconds crosses the mucous membrane directly and skips both. It is the same reason a handful of prescription medicines are made as sublinguals rather than pills — the format is doing real work, not marketing work.

Stone mortar with maca, fenugreek, turmeric and nettle
The traditional preparation was never a pill. It was the whole root, ground, taken daily, for years.
What is actually in the bottle
Maca rootMaca root80 mg30:1 extract. Adaptogen, not a hormone. The Andean one.
AshwagandhaAshwagandha80 mg10:1 extract. The cortisol side — the best-evidenced ingredient here.
FenugreekFenugreek50 mgThe actual phytoestrogen. Can lower blood sugar. Peanut/legume cross-allergen.
Beet rootBeet root70 mg30:1. Nitrate to nitric oxide. Circulation, unglamorously.
L-arginineL-arginine4 mgA co-factor alongside the beet root, at a co-factor dose.
+5
Supporting blend50 mgTongkat ali, ginseng, turmeric, nettle, slippery elm.
Per 2 mL serving. Liquid held under the tongue rather than a capsule. Not a hormone, not hormone replacement, not a weight-loss product.
See the full label and current pricing →Opens the product page

What eleven months looked like

Beverly is precise about this because she says the vagueness is how people get taken.

Weeks 1–2Sleep, then energy. "I stopped hitting a wall at three in the afternoon. That was the first thing and honestly I put it down to the weather."
Weeks 5–8The bloating settled. "My rings fit on a Thursday, which they had not done in a while."
Month 3–4Clothes, not the scale. "The navy dress did up. The scale said a hundred and sixty. It has said a hundred and sixty this entire time."
Month 9+Other people noticed before she said anything. "My sister asked what I was doing. I hadn't told her. That was the part that got me."
One woman's account, not a clinical result. Individual results vary, and plenty of women will feel the energy change and nothing else. If you need something to work by week two, this is the wrong bottle.
Two droppers, held for thirty seconds. Beverly takes hers in coffee and says she stopped noticing the taste in the second week.
Plant-basedNo synthetic hormones
90 daysOpened bottles included
Made in the USAGMP facility

The drops she describes in this piece

Beverly does not name a brand in the body of this article. For the readers who have written in asking: it is ADIRA DailyDrop™ — the five botanicals above, sublingual, with the headline milligrams printed on the label rather than hidden inside a "proprietary blend".
See the label and current pricing →Opens the product page
Returns are handled by the brand — 90 days, opened bottles included.
The Midlife Review may earn a commission on purchases made through links in this article. Nothing in this piece was reviewed or approved by the brand before publication. Speak to whoever prescribes your medication before adding any supplement — particularly if you take anything for blood sugar or thyroid, or if you are pregnant or nursing.

Before you order

Is this going to make me lose weight?
No. Beverly's scale has not moved in eleven years and she says so three times in this piece. There is no weight-loss claim on this page, and you should be suspicious of any page in this category that makes one.
Does it move fat from my stomach to my hips?
No, and nothing you swallow does. That is the single most common lie in this category. This is about the upstream signalling and the cortisol side — a smaller claim, and the only one that is defensible.
I read that maca is a phytoestrogen.
You read wrong, and it is a very widespread error. Maca is an adaptogen. In the trials that measured it, oestradiol, FSH and LH did not change. The genuine phytoestrogen in this formula is the fenugreek.
Is it a hormone, or HRT?
Neither, and it is not a substitute for either. No plant replaces what a body has stopped producing. If hormone therapy is what you need, that conversation is with your doctor.
Can I take it with my medication?
Ask whoever prescribes it — and this matters more than usual here. Fenugreek can lower blood sugar, which is a real consideration on metformin or anything else for diabetes. Same conversation for thyroid medication, and if you are pregnant or nursing.
Why liquid instead of capsules?
A capsule goes through stomach acid and a first pass through the liver. A liquid held under the tongue for thirty seconds crosses the membrane directly and skips both. Beverly had already written maca off after twelve dollars of capsules did nothing.
How long before anything happens?
Energy and sleep first, usually inside a fortnight. Clothes, in Beverly's case, at around three months. If you need week two, buy something else.
What if it does nothing for me?
90 days, money back, opened bottles included. Returns are handled by the brand, not by this publication.

What readers have written in

Lightly trimmed for length, names shortened.

★★★★★
The part about the blood panel not asking the right question. That is exactly my last four years and nobody has ever put it like that.
Carla D.49 · Memphis TN
Verified
★★★★★
I appreciated that it came straight out and said it doesn't move fat. I've read maybe nine of these pages and this is the first honest one.
Teresa J.47 · Milwaukee WI
Verified
★★★★★
Month four. Scale hasn't moved an ounce. I've stopped trying to explain it to people and just enjoy it.
Angela B.52 · Park Forest IL
Verified
★★★★★
I'm a night nurse. The three o'clock wall going away was worth the money on its own, whatever else it does.
Michelle R.51 · Brentwood NY
Verified
★★★★☆
Energy yes, shape not really, and I'm nine weeks in. Staying on it because the sleep alone is worth it. Being honest since the page was.
Linda F.54 · Hyde Park MA
Verified
★★★★★
My grandmother drank root teas her whole life and kept her figure into her seventies. I always thought it was genes.
Yvonne T.48 · Murfreesboro NC
Verified
Reader comments on this article
214 commentsMost relevant ▾
Gloria Sandersmy labs were normal too!!!! i have been saying this to that woman for THREE YEARS
👍❤️487
LikeReply2d
Tanya Brooksfinally a page that says straight out it does not move fat. every single other one lies about that
👍❤️356
LikeReply3d
Marguerite OseiThat was the whole reason for writing it this way. — MO
LikeReply3d
Vanessa Whitfieldchanged address. nobody has explained it to me like that in twenty years of asking
👍❤️298
LikeReply4d
Deborah Kentok but the maca not being a phytoestrogen thing. i have been told the opposite by two different health stores 😑
👍❤️171
LikeReply5d
Marguerite OseiBoth stores are repeating the same error. The hormone measurements are in the trials and they did not move. — MO
LikeReply5d
Paulette M.im 58, wondering if that ship has sailed for me
👍❤️84
LikeReply1w
Marguerite OseiNothing in this is calibrated to an age. — MO
LikeReply1w
View 41 more comments
Beverly still has not told her sister what she is taking. "She read the article before I ever got round to saying it out loud. Which is probably how it was always going to go."
See the label and current pricing →Opens the product page
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. Individual results vary. Consult your physician before use if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking prescription medication.
Sources: Lovejoy et al., Int J Obes 2008 · Meissner et al., Int J Biomed Sci 2005 · Chandrasekhar et al., Indian J Psychol Med 2012 · Gonzales, Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012.
© The Midlife Review · Advertiser disclosure · Terms · Privacy · Refunds · Contact