She Went Looking For Why Her Shape Changed at 51. The Answer Was In A Field At 14,000 Feet.

It was a zipper on a dress she had owned for nine years.
Not a scale. The scale had been telling Beverly roughly the same story since her youngest started high school — one hundred sixty-one, give or take four pounds, every Sunday morning, same bathroom tile. The number was not the problem. The number had never been the problem.
"It was my niece's graduation," she says. "Navy dress. I'd worn it to two funerals and a wedding. And I got it up to about here" — she holds a hand flat against her ribs — "and it stopped. Same dress. Same weight. I stood in my bedroom and I genuinely could not work out what had happened to me."
Beverly is 51, works in medical billing on the South Side of Chicago, and has kept the same Sunday weigh-in ritual for over a decade. What follows is her account of the two years she spent trying to get a straight answer, and what she found at the end of it — which was not what she went looking for.
"Everything came back normal"
She did go and ask. That was the October after the graduation.
"I sat there and I said, my body has changed shape and I have not changed anything. And she was kind about it. She ordered the panel."
The bloodwork came back the following week. Every line inside the reference range. Thyroid fine. Fasting glucose fine. And then the sentence Beverly says she has since heard from four different women at her church, almost word for word: that's just what happens.
She is careful to be fair about this. "She wasn't being lazy with me. She wasn't wrong, either." A blood panel measures how much of something is circulating on the particular morning you happen to sit down in the chair. There is no line on that sheet for the question Beverly was actually asking — which was not how much, but where.

Nothing left. It relocated.
The part nobody had explained to her is not controversial and is not new. It is simply not what gets said in a twelve-minute appointment.
Oestrogen does more than reproduction. Among other jobs, it is one of the signals that tells the body where to keep fat — which is why, for about thirty years, women bank it at the hips and thighs and glutes. When that signal fades through the forties and fifties, the body does not necessarily store more. It stores it somewhere else. The abdomen.
A longitudinal study out of Pennington published in 2008 followed women straight through the menopausal transition and measured it: visceral fat up, energy expenditure down, and the change tracked the transition itself rather than the birthdays.
This reframes almost everything Beverly had already tried. "I did eighteen months of squats. Three days a week. I have never had stronger legs in my life and it did absolutely nothing to the shape of me."
It wouldn't. A diet lowers the total. Training builds what is underneath. Neither one issues the instruction about where — and if the instruction is what changed, neither one is aimed at the problem.
The root that kept coming up
Beverly says she spent most of the following winter reading. "I'm in medical billing. I read documents for a living. So I went and read."
The same plant kept surfacing, and it was not one she had heard of in any pharmacy aisle.
Maca — Lepidium meyenii — grows on the Junín plateau in the central Peruvian Andes, between roughly 13,000 and 14,500 feet. It is a brutal place to farm anything: freezing nights, thin air, punishing ultraviolet, poor soil. Very little food crop tolerates it. Maca does.
The Quechua-speaking communities of that plateau — the descendants of the people who ran the Inca state out of Cusco — have cultivated it there for an extremely long time. Peruvian researchers date domestication to somewhere around 1600 BC. It has been traded, taxed, dried on the ground in the sun for weeks the way it still is, and eaten daily, for most of recorded Andean history.

What it is — and what it is not
Here is where Beverly says most of what she read online turned out to be wrong, and where this article is going to disagree with a lot of its competitors.
Maca is not a phytoestrogen. It is an adaptogen. This matters, and it is testable, and it has been tested: in the trials that actually measured the hormones, women's oestradiol, FSH and LH did not move. Whatever maca is doing, it is not doing it by acting like a hormone or by putting one into you.
What did move, in a 2005 double-blind trial in early-postmenopausal women, were the symptom scores — and they moved against placebo. The compounds it carries that are not found in other plants are called macamides and macaenes.
"That was the thing that made me trust it, weirdly," Beverly says. "Everything else I'd looked at was promising me my twenties back. This was a plant that did one modest thing and had the paperwork for it."
The second root: the one for the stress
Maca on its own did not account for everything she was dealing with, and she is blunt about the rest of it.
"I was doing twelve-hour shifts and caring for my mother. My cortisol was not a mystery."
Cortisol is the other half of this story and it is the half with the cleanest evidence. Chronically elevated cortisol pushes storage toward the abdomen specifically — it works in the same direction as the oestrogen shift, which is why the two together are so much worse than either alone. A 2012 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ashwagandha root extract measured serum cortisol down substantially against placebo over sixty days.
Ashwagandha is Indian, not Andean — used in Ayurvedic practice for about three thousand years, on a different continent, for reasons that had nothing to do with any of this. It ended up in the same bottle for a boring modern reason: it is the best-evidenced thing available for the cortisol side.

The one that actually is a phytoestrogen
If you have been told that this category works by "plant oestrogens", the plant they meant is almost certainly not maca. It is fenugreek.
Fenugreek is the genuine phytoestrogen here, and it is the one with the real cautions attached: it can lower blood sugar, which is a live consideration if you take metformin or anything else for diabetes, and it cross-reacts with peanut and legume allergies. Beverly checked with her mother's pharmacist before she started, which is what anyone should do.
Alongside those three sit beet root and a small amount of L-arginine — nitrate to nitric oxide, an established and unglamorous pathway — plus tongkat ali, ginseng, turmeric, nettle and slippery elm at supporting weights.
Under the tongue, not down the throat
The last thing Beverly changed was the format, and she says it is the part she would have dismissed a year earlier.
She had already bought maca capsules once. Twelve dollars. "Did nothing. I assumed the plant was rubbish."
A capsule has to survive stomach acid and then a first pass through the liver before anything reaches circulation. A liquid held under the tongue for thirty seconds crosses the mucous membrane directly and skips both. It is the same reason a handful of prescription medicines are made as sublinguals rather than pills — the format is doing real work, not marketing work.

Maca root80 mg30:1 extract. Adaptogen, not a hormone. The Andean one.
Ashwagandha80 mg10:1 extract. The cortisol side — the best-evidenced ingredient here.
Fenugreek50 mgThe actual phytoestrogen. Can lower blood sugar. Peanut/legume cross-allergen.
Beet root70 mg30:1. Nitrate to nitric oxide. Circulation, unglamorously.
L-arginine4 mgA co-factor alongside the beet root, at a co-factor dose.What eleven months looked like
Beverly is precise about this because she says the vagueness is how people get taken.

The drops she describes in this piece
Before you order
Is this going to make me lose weight?
Does it move fat from my stomach to my hips?
I read that maca is a phytoestrogen.
Is it a hormone, or HRT?
Can I take it with my medication?
Why liquid instead of capsules?
How long before anything happens?
What if it does nothing for me?
What readers have written in
Lightly trimmed for length, names shortened.
The part about the blood panel not asking the right question. That is exactly my last four years and nobody has ever put it like that.
I appreciated that it came straight out and said it doesn't move fat. I've read maybe nine of these pages and this is the first honest one.
Month four. Scale hasn't moved an ounce. I've stopped trying to explain it to people and just enjoy it.
I'm a night nurse. The three o'clock wall going away was worth the money on its own, whatever else it does.
Energy yes, shape not really, and I'm nine weeks in. Staying on it because the sleep alone is worth it. Being honest since the page was.
My grandmother drank root teas her whole life and kept her figure into her seventies. I always thought it was genes.





Sources: Lovejoy et al., Int J Obes 2008 · Meissner et al., Int J Biomed Sci 2005 · Chandrasekhar et al., Indian J Psychol Med 2012 · Gonzales, Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2012.
© The Midlife Review · Advertiser disclosure · Terms · Privacy · Refunds · Contact
